Hello,

No, we are not using VLAN, all the computers in the office belong to the
same LAN.

Regards.

2011/10/5 richard nicholson <[email protected]>

> Sergio
>
> As you using layer II VLAN's between your physical switches? If so - make
> sure your network
> folks have IGMP turned on - on the switch interlinks.
>
> Cheers
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 09:38, Sergio Aguilera Cazorla wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Our network administrators say that *our company's switches do not block
> > multicast or broadcast traffic*. To check if this it's true, we've
> forgotten
> > about Reggie and we've written a little Java program that simply uses a
> > MulticastSocket to send packets to the multicast IP *224.0.1.84 and
> > attacking the port 4160*. Of course, this program failed in the network
> > office, while it worked perfectly on my home's network.
> >
> > We are completely sure that it's a problem related to multicast packets.
> > Maybe it's related to Windows XP or 7 Firewall? In the company there is a
> > Group Policy commanding the Firewall, but we can define some exceptions
> and
> > we have the multicast/broadcast response enabled. Is that enough, or is
> > there some other issue that remains hidden?
> >
> > Please, any hint is welcome, because our goal is to deploy this software
> in
> > a production environment, not only in a domestic network!
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> >
> >
> >
> > 2011/9/29 Christopher Dolan <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Yes, most enterprise switches block multicast by default. That's
> probably
> >> your issue.
> >>
> >> Another possible issue is reverse DNS. If reggie is broadcasting a
> private
> >> hostname or IP address for other machines to call back to it, then it's
> not
> >> going to work. We've also had issues with dual-NIC servers where clients
> >> always try to connect to the primary NIC (as specified in the Windows
> >> interface binding order) and do not fail over to the secondary NIC. The
> >> usual cause of that problem is passing a null host to
> >> TcpServerEndpoint.getInstance() because in that code path, JERI just
> picks
> >> the first IP address from a reverse DNS lookup. The solution in that
> case is
> >> to instead pass the results of
> >> InetAddress.getLocalHost().getCanonicalHostName() as the hostname, or
> >> hard-code the public host name.
> >>
> >> I'm suspicious of your "just once" result. Maybe you changed the group
> >> name? Remember that the group is case-sensitive.
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sergio Aguilera Cazorla [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 1:16 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: Reggie's visibility in discovery process
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> At last we could perform some testing on Reggie's discovery using
> multicast
> >> protocol. I can provide the following results:
> >>
> >> - The program performs perfectly when we make a Unicast discovery,
> >> attacking
> >> directly the URL where the Lookup service is located.
> >>
> >> - We can ping the two machines. Even, we can acces the folder server by
> the
> >> HTTP server, and get the reggie-dl.jar classfiles needed to communicate
> >> with
> >> the Lookup.
> >>
> >> - All machines in the office are Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7. None of
> the
> >> combinations server/client XP-7 has thrown a good result.
> >>
> >> - We are communicating through switches in the LAN of a enterprise. Do
> you
> >> think that multicast packets are bein blocked by intermediate nodes?
> >>
> >> - The most misteryous fact: we could perform multicast discovery
> >> succesfully
> >> *just once*, the first time we tried. That's suspicious, is there some
> >> class
> >> or service that remains hidden and doesn't allow you to perform
> multicast
> >> discovery more than once?
> >>
> >> Any help on reggie's weird behaviour is very welcome. If I can solve
> this
> >> problem, no doubt I will write a short explanation for the community,
> >> because I think it has to be a very common problem.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2011/9/22 Иван Бишевац <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>> 1. Could you ping two machines?
> >>> 2. Which operating system you use?
> >>> 3. Are you communicating through router?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Sergio Aguilera*
>
>


-- 
*Sergio Aguilera*

Reply via email to