Turn on debugging for Atom, restart Roller, make a post and take a
look at what happened in the logs at the time you made that post.

To enable Atom protocol debug, add this to your roller-custom.properties file:
log4j.category.org.apache.roller.weblogger.webservices.atomprotocol=DEBUG

The problem might be that Roller 4.0 has been updated for the final
APP spec and Propono 0.5 has not. I just uploaded a snapshot of
Propono 0.6, which has been updated and is just about ready for
release:

   
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/experimental/rome-propono-0.6-snapshot.jar

- Dave



On 9/11/07, Dudee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I'm using:
> Apache Roller Weblogger Version 4.0
> MySQL 5 (I know this is working at least, because I get another error when
> username and password is incorrect.)
> Tomcat 5.5
> Java 6.0
> Rome Propono 0.5 (latest release)
> Windows Vista
> Blogger and MetaWeblog API support is enabled.
>
>
>
>
> Dave Johnson-8 wrote:
> >
> > On 9/11/07, Dudee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What am I doing wrong. I'm trying to post to my roller app but I get an
> >> error. Looks like no workspace are found which is strange since the user
> >> has
> >> a blog and when I look at the service-document there is a workspace. Help
> >> needed!
> >
> > It's almost always helpful to answer the standard questions when
> > seeking Roller support:
> > -What version of Roller are you using? If you are building from
> > sources, on which branch are you building?
> > - What Application Server version are you using?
> > - What database are you using?
> > - What Java version are you using?
> > - What operating system are you using?
> >
> > And which version of Propono?
> >
> > And note that you have to enable Blogger and MetaWeblog API support on
> > your weblog's preferences page for APP to work.
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Help-noob-with-rome-propono-%21%21-tf4422109s12275.html#a12613694
> Sent from the Roller - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to