Could you please remove me as well please?

Or maybe Glen and Gaurav could discuss in a private thread?

Thanks



On 10 December 2013 17:48, Hertling, William E <william.hertl...@hp.com>wrote:

> How do I get off this mailing list?
>
> On 12/10/13, 9:10 AM, "Glen Mazza" <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I meant the template guide, not the user guide.
> >
> >Glen
> >
> >On 12/10/2013 10:46 AM, Gaurav wrote:
> >> Hello Glen,
> >>
> >> I looked into user guide at
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/roller/trunk/docs/roller-user-guide.odt
> >> This user guide did not have Section 7.7. If I am mistaken Can you
> >> please provide me correct url to the latest doc
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Gaurav
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 10 December 2013 08:47 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
> >>> I haven't looked into tag clouds yet. How to build them is described
> >>> in Section 7.7 of the latest (5.1.0-SNAPSHOT) Roller guide.  If
> >>> there's a bug in the template (or the guide), please enter a JIRA for
> >>> it, and if you can supply a patch to fix it that would be great.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Glen
> >>>
> >>> On 12/10/2013 09:39 AM, Gaurav wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> The tag cloud did not increase the size of text with the intensity
> >>>> of tags used.
> >>>>
> >>>> Velocity Code (In this the tags which have count > 5 will be shown)
> >>>>
> >>>> #set($mytags = $model.weblog.getPopularTags(-1, 30))
> >>>> #foreach ($tag in $mytags)
> >>>>     #if ($tag.count > 5)
> >>>>         <a class="tag s${tag.intensity}" href="$url.tag($tag.name)"
> >>>> title="$tag.count">$tag.name 3232</a>
> >>>>     #end
> >>>> #end
> >>>>
> >>>> The class used for increasing the tags size are s1,s2,s3,s4,s5. As
> >>>> the tag intensity is between (1-5) and tag with 1 count has
> >>>> intensity 1 and similarly untill 5. Tags with count greater than 5
> >>>> has intensity 5.
> >>>> So as the #if condition says tags with count > 5 will be shown, then
> >>>> all the will have same class s5 and there will be no difference in
> >>>> font size.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think, I was able to communicate what I want to explain. Can
> >>>> anyone please look into this ?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to