Hi Dave,

Thank you for looking into this.  I haven't tested thoroughly enough but it
seems only
these 2 images that are affected which were downloaded from the internet
long time ago:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=17x5bAQumPq_Q2lKlTP03JCZ8mkMVnl1g
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1XQomqxXCJRykrGJw7ze64SybS1yvv4Hk

The metadata / EXIF is very minimal per Window's Explorer properties.
Maybe something hidden that prevents image processing application from
'tampering' ?
My environment guest VMs are:

OS: FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p3 amd64 (both DB and Web)
JDK is java/openjdk11 (ports built)  11.0.6+10-1
Tomcat 9.033 + Apache 2.4
MariaDB 10.4.12

I run mainly FreeBSD due to ease and flexibility of management and
customization.
When I started to troubleshoot this issue, I noticed some discrepancy in
the logging
due to log4j (v1) dependency.  Log4j is broken in Java 9+ from my
research.  I've replaced
all the necessary logging jars and switched over to log4j2:

# blog/WEB-INF/lib # ll *log* *slf*
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    61829 Jun  9  2019 commons-logging-1.2.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www   201684 Mar 30 02:44 log4j-1.2-api-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www   292244 Mar 27 21:37 log4j-api-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www  1702809 Mar 27 21:37 log4j-core-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    12657 Mar 30 02:44 log4j-jcl-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    26166 Mar 30 02:44 log4j-jul-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    23591 Mar 27 21:37 log4j-slf4j-impl-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    32327 Mar 30 02:44 log4j-taglib-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    32475 Mar 30 02:44 log4j-web-2.13.1.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 root  www    41472 Mar 27 13:50 slf4j-api-1.7.30.jar

 and using my log4j2.xml file generated by this:

http://www.sointe.com/log4j2.php

I got tired of typing them out when I was troubleshooting some Java apps
recently.
You just enter the framework or provider you'd like and it'll generate the
file for you.

Thanks,
Tommy

On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 1:41 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tommy,
>
> I'm not able to reproduce this problem.  Here's what I tried:
>
> - Upload large image via the Media File View page
> - Go into the mediafiles directory for the corresponding blog and delete
> the thumbnail image of the upload (the file with the _sm suffix)
> - Navigate back to the the Media File View for the blog, reload the page
> - See that the large image is displayed as the thumbnail and it is
> correctly sized because the <img> tag specifies thumbnail size height and
> width attributes.
>
> I also debugged into the MediaResourceServlet.java to verify that, if a
> thumbnail image is missing, the original image will be returned. Is it
> possible for you to share that "FRAGILE" image that is causing the problem?
>
> Also, what Java VM version, operating system version and database are you
> using?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 10:40 AM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Apparently, ImageIO.read() only supports six image formats and if it does
> > not recognize the image format, it returns null instead of an error. That
> > must be why the thumbnail creation fails. Roller is able to upload the
> > image and save it as a file, but then when it tries to read the image so
> > that it can scale it down to thumbnail size ImageIO.read() returns null
> and
> > we get that NPE.
> >
> > There maybe a way to work around this problem by falling back to the
> > full-sized image and scale it down in the Media File View. I'm going to
> > look into that option. I think that is how the Media File View page was
> > intended to work anyway but I may have broken that logic during the
> > Bootstrap rewrite.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:30 PM Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> I've cloned the code from github and checked out roller-6.0.x 7d11070.
> I
> >> then modified the JPAMedifaFileManagerImpl to have some trace logging
> >> hoping to find the root cause.  For some reason, ImageIO.read() fails
> for
> >> that particular JPEG image even though other JPEG images upload OK.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tommy
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I guess I was wrong.  Putting in jaxb-runtime-2.3.3-b02.jar didn't
> >> resolve
> >> > the NPE for creating thumbnail.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:28 PM Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Dave,
> >> >>
> >> >> I apologize for unable to submit the JIRA.  Something came up after
> >> >> typing that email and have been preoccupied since.  I'm using
> (native)
> >> >> OpenJDK 11on FreeBSD 12.1.  I just made some updates to the logging
> >> >> configurations since I saw log4j (v1) and that it's broken on Java
> 9+.
> >> >> Here's the recent snippet:
> >> >>
> >> >> 24-Mar-2020 20:01:58.056 DEBUG [http-nio-8080-exec-1]
> >> >>
> >>
> org.apache.roller.weblogger.business.jpa.JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.getMediaFile:361
> >> >> - Cannot load thumbnail for image
> 7c8b9f04-8cbc-4172-b3d0-ef601d040d00
> >> >> org.apache.roller.weblogger.business.FileNotFoundException: Invalid
> >> path
> >> >>
> >>
> [/usr/local/www/_apps_/java/roller6_data/mediafiles/Tommy/7c8b9f04-8cbc-4172-b3d0-ef601d040d00_sm],
> >> >> file does not exist.
> >> >>
> >> >> That file does not exists.  Only the main original image (?).  It
> seems
> >> >> the thumbnails didn't generate.
> >> >>
> >> >> 24-Mar-2020 20:12:07.120 DEBUG [http-nio-8080-exec-6]
> >> >>
> >>
> org.apache.roller.weblogger.business.jpa.JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.updateThumbnail:283
> >> >> - ERROR creating thumbnail
> >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException: null
> >> >>         at
> >> >>
> >>
> org.apache.roller.weblogger.business.jpa.JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.updateThumbnail(JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.java:256)
> >> >> [classes/:?]
> >> >>         at
> >> >>
> >>
> org.apache.roller.weblogger.business.jpa.JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.createMediaFile(JPAMediaFileManagerImpl.java:220)
> >> >> [classes/:?]
> >> >>         at
> >> >>
> >>
> org.apache.roller.weblogger.ui.struts2.editor.MediaFileAdd.save(MediaFileAdd.java:195)
> >> >> [classes/:?]
> >> >>         at
> jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> >> >> Method) ~[?:?]
> >> >>         at
> >> >>
> >>
> jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >> >> ~[?:?]
> >> >>         at
> >> >>
> >>
> jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> >> ~[?:?]
> >> >>
> >> >> Full stack trace:  https://pastebin.com/W8dgE22M
> >> >>
> >> >> From the NPE and seeing jaxb-api in lib, I think I'm missing
> >> >> implementation jar(s) for javax.xml.bind because I'm using JDK 11.
> >> >>
> >> >> I saw mixed logging mechanisms due various frameworks used.  What
> would
> >> >> be the main?  What does Roller uses to image modification /
> generation?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Tommy
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 2:03 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi Tommy,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I created a JIRA for you Media Files bug, but I cannot reproduce the
> >> >>> problem. Please see my comment here:
> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROL-2163
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Dave
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:25 AM Swapnil M Mane <
> >> swapnilmm...@apache.org>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > Hi Tommy,
> >> >>> > Yes, you can keep it Improvement with minor priority.
> >> >>> > Although this also falls under UI Bug, but anyways since it is not
> >> >>> > breaking anything, I consider it as UI improvement.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > So, let's have it as Improvement with minor priority.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Best regards,
> >> >>> > Swapnil M Mane,
> >> >>> > www.apache.org
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:31 AM Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Hi Dave,
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > What type should I file it under? Improvement? And minor
> priority
> >> (or
> >> >>> > > trivial) ?
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Thanks,
> >> >>> > > Tommy
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:00 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > > That's not by design or really a bug, it's just poorly done
> :-)
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Please file a JIRA bug for it if you have time, otherwise I'll
> >> do
> >> >>> that
> >> >>> > this
> >> >>> > > > weekend.
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Thanks,
> >> >>> > > > Dave
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Tommy Pham <tommy...@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Hello everyone,
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > I'm having an issue with the media files panel display.
> I've
> >> >>> tried
> >> >>> > in
> >> >>> > > > both
> >> >>> > > > > Firefox and Chrome without success.
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > https://imgur.com/a/zHXnmXV
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Basically I have to scroll to view a big image while I have
> >> >>> plenty of
> >> >>> > > > > screen real estate at the bottom as you can see.  The only
> >> way I
> >> >>> can
> >> >>> > get
> >> >>> > > > > that window to resize so I could see the image entirely
> >> without
> >> >>> > scrolling
> >> >>> > > > > is edit either:
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > >    <div id="imageGrid" style="1000px">
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > or it's child div
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > >   <div class="panel-body" style="1000px">
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Neither seems like a good solution since it's not sized
> >> >>> accordingly
> >> >>> > nor
> >> >>> > > > > scale dynamically to browser window size.  Is this by design
> >> or
> >> >>> bug?
> >> >>> > > > > Please advise.
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > If you're wondering what monitor I'm using, it's 40" 4k TV
> for
> >> >>> about
> >> >>> > $300
> >> >>> > > > > USD which is cheaper than getting 4 x 27" (2560x1440) for
> >> about
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> > same
> >> >>> > > > > screen real estate (slightly better PPI 110 vs 108) w/o the
> >> split
> >> >>> > screen
> >> >>> > > > > bezels :)
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Thanks,
> >> >>> > > > > Tommy
> >> >>> > > > >
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to