Selon James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yeah its confusing :) > > For now we're trying out the JAX-WS RI for our WS-* implementations. > I'm sure there will be a few different implementations of JAX-WS - > sometimes choice is a good thing. Though certainly we're recommending > folks program to the JAX-WS model (JAXB 2.0 for marshalling, JSR 181 > annotations for WS stuff and for service invocation/hosting glue, JAX- > WS APIs).
Different implementations of the same standard is definitely a good thing (especially with truly free licenses, I'm not sure what the CDDL allows me to do.. yeah, another thing to read about ;p). But it looks like the .Net way of exposing web services is the approach most people prefer, and JSR 181 + JAX-WS + JAXB 2.0 seems to be the nearest equivalent. So let's hope there's going to be a consensus about this. > > I think XFire can/will support JAX-WS (or at least JSR 181 > annotations) - I'm not sure if its implemented the JAX-WS APIs > (Service/ServiceFactory, Endpoint/EndpointFactory etc). One day Axis > 2 might implement JAX-WS and there could be other stacks coming along > too I hope. OK Nice ! You mention ActiveSOAP in one of your previous emails to me (yeah, sorry, I'm sollicitating you a lot...), that would allow me to marshall POJOs and talk to my BPEL process for example. Is this unique to ActiveSOAP, or is it also available in AXIS + XFire ? (I definitely want to try to avoid using 10 different libraries to do the same things.. Otherwise, the poor guys that are going to maintain / enhance my code are going to die ;) Anyways, I'll probably try to create some documentation about the technology I used so that other programmers can understand what I did. (like everybody I guess, I'm just running out of time..) I'll clearly separate it from the design documents so that I can post it here, more documentation is definitely a must for everybody. > > The nice thing is from an application developer you just depend on > JAX-* standards (javax.*) stuff and your code, in theory should be > deployable in various stacks. > nice :) Regards, Sami Dalouche ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
