Oops...just noticed that it's GBean (not QBean). My mail client rendered
the lowercase g to look like a q.
The question still stands...why GBean vs. XBean?
Craig Walls wrote:
Is qbean.codehaus.org to be the "official" way of extending Spring's
XML format? Or is there still something planned to be rolled into some
future version of Spring itself?
A few more questions...
Why is it called XBean in some places and QBean in others?
And you say "so that it won't depend on a non official spring
version." But in QBean's wiki, it says that I should use XBean
versions of the usual Spring ApplicationContext classes. How can it
not depend on non official Spring, but use QBean-specific application
contexts? (I think I know the answer to this...it is because QBean's
application contexts are extensions of official Spring contexts?)
Just trying to clear things up a bit...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source code is in spring cvs.
It has been removed before 1.2.2, so you'll have to
checkout with a specific date to find them.
Btw, xbean (http://gbean.codehaus.org), will be hopefully
integrated soon in ServiceMix
so that it won't depend on a non official spring version.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
---------- Initial Header -----------
From : Peter Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [email protected]
Cc : Date : Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:07:25 +1000
Subject : [servicemix-user] Spring source code?
My understanding was that ServiceMix augments Spring to
support extra XML elements like <container>, <components> etc. But where
can I find the modified Spring source code associated with your
spring-1.2.2-dev-2.jar?
Thanks,
Peter.
------------ ALICE HAUT DEBIT A 29,95 EUR/MOIS ------------
ALICEBOX, l'offre Internet tout en 1 : ADSL, téléphonie, modem Wi-Fi
et en exclusivité
la hotline gratuite 24h/24 ! Soumis à conditions. Pour en profiter
cliquez ici http://abonnement.aliceadsl.fr
