Hm realized that i've got a warning:

 WARN main org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator - More than one
managed bean w/ the name of 'org$apache$shale$view$EXCEPTION_HANDLER' -
only keeping the last

Hm which one it keeps - i hope mine?

Torsten

Am Mittwoch, den 18.10.2006, 09:14 +0200 schrieb Torsten Krah:
> Looking at:
> 
> http://wiki.apache.org/shale/ExceptionHandling
> 
> i created a error handler which implements
> org.apache.shale.view.ExceptionHandler.
> 
> I've than stored it in application scope - faces-config.xml:
> 
> <managed-bean>
>               <managed-bean-name>
>                       org$apache$shale$view$EXCEPTION_HANDLER
>               </managed-bean-name>
>               <managed-bean-class>
>                       my.util.ErrorHandler
>               </managed-bean-class>
>               <managed-bean-scope>application</managed-bean-scope>
>       </managed-bean>
> 
> Is this correct or wrong?
> 
> I've than debugged the application - my error handler does not get
> called ... if the above one is right, it should be called, should it?
> 
> Torsten
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 17.10.2006, 22:02 -0700 schrieb Craig McClanahan:
> > On 10/17/06, Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-277
> > >
> > > Does anyone got it working - i mean the custom error page which is
> > > configured through the param mentioned there.
> > > If yes - any hints how to get it work or debug would be nice - because
> > > the resolution is "not a problem", but for me it is one ...
> > 
> > 
> > I closed the issue with that status because I could not reproduce the
> > situation you have found yourself in (which is a prerequisite for fixiing
> > such a problem :-).   Plus,  If you can tell me how to reproduce the
> > problems you see, please feel free to reopen the SHALE-277 issue and provide
> > the instructions for how to demonstrate that the current code is broken.
> > There is a use case in the shale-usecases app that works for me ... does it
> > work for you?
> > 
> > Craig
> > 
> > 
> > kind regards
> > >
> > >
> 

Reply via email to