Its working if i add the token as last input component it works as expected. I wrote a few words [1] for the token usage.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/shale/Token On 11/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I second that (Should still be on a wiki page too) Hermod -----Original Message----- From: Torsten Krah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:35 PM To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: RE: Problem with Shale Token This would be sufficient but i would like to see it in the tlddoc too. Torsten Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 06:29 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Er, that's not javadoc - that's comments inside the method. If this was moved to > the javadoc it would be sufficient IMHO. > > > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Hi > > > > It does if you read the javadoc for org.apache.shale.component.Token in the > > validate method: > > /** > > * <p>Perform superclass validations, then ensure that the specified > > input > > * value is acceptable at this point in time.</p> > > * > > * @param context <code>FacesContext</code> for the current request > > */ > > public void validate(FacesContext context) { > > > > // If any of the other input components in this form triggered > > // validation errors, we do NOT want to validate the token component > > // here, because that would erase the saved token and prevent the > > // subsequent valid resubmit from succeeding. > > // > > // WARNING - for this test to be successful, the token component must > > // be the last input component child of the parent form to be > > // processed > > if (context.getMaximumSeverity() != null) { > > ..... > > > > I think that maybe the wiki should mention this also though. > > > > > > Hermod > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Torsten Krah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:47 AM > > To: user@shale.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Problem with Shale Token > > > > > > Ok its working. > > > > I did not know until now - that it have to be the last component - i put > > it everytime in the front, now it works - the documentation should maybe > > tell that. > > > > Torsten > > > > Am Montag, den 06.11.2006, 23:49 -0800 schrieb Craig McClanahan: > > > On 11/6/06, Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Token is broken for myfaces greater than 1.1.1. > > > > > > > > Look there: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-287 > > > > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > Am Montag, den 06.11.2006, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Adrian Mitev: > > > > > Hi all! I have problem using s:token. > > > > > I have form with input fields and required="true". When i leave the > > > > > field empty, the page is redisplayed with error message. Then i fill > > > > > the field with some text and click on the submit button. There i get > > > > > error message from the token component. Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I have done a bunch of further investigation of this problem, including > > > a new test app (built against MyFaces 1.1.4 and the current trunk code of > > > Shale, equivalent to the 20061107 nightly build). As far as I can tell, > > the > > > current code works correctly. I've attached the current version of the > > test > > > application (shale-test-core.war) to the relevant bug report[1]. PLEASE do > > > everything you can to cause this app to misbehave with regards to token > > > processing, so we can shake out any remaining problems. But, I assert, the > > > problems with the token component in the Shale 1.0.3 release have been > > > repaired. If there are positive reports of lack of ability to break the > > > test app, or no comment at all for a few days, I'm going to close this > > issue > > > as having been fixed. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-287 > > > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > > > This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or > > entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that DnB NOR cannot > > accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with > > customers as a part of an email. > > > > This email message has been virus checked by the anti virus programs used > > in the DnB NOR Group. > > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > > >
-- Seeing is believing