icefaces + shale viewcontroller etc sounds interesting,
not sure about the mozilla license here in apache, but inside of code.google.de (shale goodies) there can be place for stuff like that -M On 11/16/06, Alexandre Touret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > Could you share more details about the problems you ran into? > The main problem is that some ajax frameworks are incompatibles with shale because shale listen (listener specified on the web.xml) on the same resource of ajax framework (eg. icefaces) I have had tested some JSF ajax frameworks: icefaces, backbase,ajax4jsf have some serve components like listeners wich make shale resources unavailable > > In addition to this question, I'd be interested in the reverse ... which > frameworks do you think we (Shale developers) should focus on being > compatible with? Currently I m testing some ajax and jsf libraries. I have no idea to say presently which ajax/jsf library is better. Futhermore, maybe, you should try to integrate shale with one of these JSF libraries ajax4jsf icefaces (now free) maybe the javascript library: dojotoolkit > My intent is to focus on building sample and testing apps > with these frameworks, and with a limited amount of time available, > I'd like > to focus on the ones people care the most about. > > Thanks in advance for your help! I probably finish soon an example of netavantage (no free) or an another framework with shale. If you want I ll send you the sources. > Craig > Regard, Alexandre
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
