On 11/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

sounds interesting

https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-338

I was thinking of a similar method, when I worked on a shale based
prototype in the past

Should we vote on this? Or what is the process ?

I have a basic impl for that on my box


This topic did indeed come up in an earlier user list conversation, and I
asked for an RFE to be filed.  If implemented it will break backwards
compatibility for any existing app that "implements ViewController" but does
not "extend AbstractViewController".  So, it *definitely* needs to be
discussed on the dev list before being implemented.

I presume you have a bunch of unit tests to support it as well?  :-)

Craig


On 11/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/20/06, Meyer, Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The preprocess method is called even if the immediate flag is set to
> > true because it is called after the restore view phase and not before
> > the model update. I want setup code to only be executed if necessary -
> > the model is updated or the view is rendered. Therefore I need a
> > prerender and a preModelUpdate method.
> >
>
> I can sort of see how a preupdate() callback might be useful, although I
am
> a bit hesitant about breaking any apps who are using ViewController
directly
> instead of extending AbstractViewController.
>
> Could you please file an RFE in our issue tracking system[1]?
>
> Craig
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/
>
>


--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Reply via email to