On 10/16/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: Iain Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > Thanks a lot for the information! Do you know if the mock implementation > > is going to be extended at any point to include dealing with lists > > reference by expressions like "#{myBean.myList[0]}"? > > > > I'm not sure. The test framework is one of the best parts of Shale but the > only problem I see in expanding for more EL support is that it becomes more > and more complicated. It's easy to draw the line with the existing mock > implementation. > > At one time I added a fix to support scopes like > "#{requestScope['xxx.xxx.xx']}" and Craig made a similar comment about > keeping the mock implementation simple. > > However, Shale is used by many of the myfaces projects. I think the > community should make the decision providing there is a volunteer to > contribute. >
I don't know how Shale Test Framework supports EL - but with the new "Unified EL" spec, which is independant of servlet/jsf it might be an idea to plug that into the test framework. Apache Tomcat has released separate jars which are now available in the maven repo. Niall > > Cheers, > > > > Iain > > > > > Gary > > > > ___________________________________________ > > Iain Duncan > > MDM Platform Services Development > > IBM UK Limited > > MP 188, Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants, SO21 2JN, UK > > t: +44 (0)1962 816873 / Internal : 7-246873 > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary VanMatre) > > 16/10/2007 16:27 > > Please respond to > > user@shale.apache.org > > > > > > To > > user@shale.apache.org > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: Using shale-test with ValueBinding lists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Iain Duncan > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I've just started using shale-test to test an application using JSF1.1 > > so > > > apologies if this is a dumb question and I am doing something obvious > > > wrong! I have been unable to get the getValue() method on a ValueBinding > > > > > that involves a list to work. Does anyone know if this has been > > > implemented? > > > > > > > Simple expressions can be evaluated. The mock implementation tokenizes > > the expression based on the "dot" separator. So, you can evaluate > > expressions like "#{mybean.property}". > > > > You have to programmatically add your beans into scope in your unit tests > > or add a few lines of logic to process faces-config's. > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Iain > > > > > > > Gary