Any suggestions? I was just looking through the code. While it's clean and
all, I'm trying to figure out a way to do this without ripping everything
apart :-)

Dan

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>wrote:

> The trick would be to make this flow cleanly.  BASIC and Form
> authentication are different concerns, and if you'd want to make them
> work together, a pluggable approach would be ideal (instead of either
> 'knowing' about the other and writing convoluted code to support
> that).  For example, it should work just as well if you'd want to
> enforce HTTP digest authentication + Form authentication as a
> backup...
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Dan Diephouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah, this is pretty much what I'm thinking as well.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jared Bunting
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would suggest that BasicHttpAuthenticationFilter have an option to
> >> enable the following workflow:
> >>
> >> If user presents authentication info, attempt to validate it, if it
> fails
> >> return authorization challenge.
> >> If user does not present authentication info, pass the request through.
> >> If subsequent processing throws an UnauthenticatedException, then return
> >> the authorization challenge.
> >>
> >> I would suggest something similar with the FormAuthenticationFilter
> >> (although I am less familiar with it).  Only block access if the user
> >> attempts to authenticate and fails, otherwise only challenge if an
> >> UnauthenticatedException is thrown.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Jared
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] on behalf of Les Hazlewood
> >> Sent: Sun 4/17/2011 1:08 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Cc: Dan Diephouse
> >> Subject: Re: Allowing form or basic auth, logouts
> >>
> >> For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-283, how do you
> >> propose that would work?
> >>
> >> In the BasicHttpAuthenticationFilter, if the Subject is not
> >> authenticated, the BASIC challenge is sent as a response and the
> >> Filter chain is not allowed to continue.
> >>
> >> How would the BasicHttpAuthenticationFilter (or a variant of it) know
> >> to let the request pass through to a form instead of send the
> >> challenge?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Les
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Dan Diephouse <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Here are the JIRAs:
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-283
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-284
> >> > Thanks for the response,
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Les Hazlewood <
> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Dan,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Dan Diephouse <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > I have two probably basic questions.
> >> >> > 1) I want to allow users to do either form OR basic authentication.
> I
> >> >> > can
> >> >> > only see how to allow one at a time or both. Is this possible?
> >> >>
> >> >> It would be possible if you wrote a custom AuthenticatingFilter to do
> >> >> this.  You'd essentially need to merge the logic of
> >> >> BasicHttpAuthenticationFilter and FormAuthenticationFilter where you
> >> >> 'fallback' to a form if there are no authentication headers.  Could
> >> >> you please create a Jira issue for this?  Also, if you do any work on
> >> >> something like this, I'd love to see it!
> >> >>
> >> >> > 2) Does Shiro have a logout filter? Just wondering if there is an
> out
> >> >> > of
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > box url I can hit to do a logout for a user.
> >> >>
> >> >> Now that I think about it, I'm surprised that we don't have this out
> >> >> of the box - it would be _incredibly_ easy to write.  We'd just have
> >> >> to
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Subclass PathMatchingFilter
> >> >> 2. Call subject.logout in the onPreHandle method implementation
> >> >> 3. Redirect to a configured 'redirectUrl' property.
> >> >>
> >> >> And that's it.  Can you please add a Jira issue for this?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > http://netzooid.com/blog
>



-- 
Dan Diephouse
http://netzooid.com/blog

Reply via email to