It certainly seems workable. That is basically what I described in #2. On May 10, 2012 3:47 PM, "rama.casturi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Jared. > > I suppose the problem is with depending on the container to provide session > management. Could this be solved if I use Shiro's native session maangement > instead of defaulting to container managed sessions? In that case, I could > probably set up two different security managers and associate one each to > the two filters that manage access to their set of URLs. Is this workable? > > Rama > > -- > View this message in context: > http://shiro-user.582556.n2.nabble.com/Sessions-from-different-filters-interfering-with-each-other-tp7451046p7548299.html > Sent from the Shiro User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
