On 3/13/07, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 02:09 PM 3/12/2007, Holger Hoffstaette wrote: >On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:29:03 +0000, Jeremy Booth wrote: > > > Is there a reason why the adapters don't implement serializable other than > > a lack of demand? Would it be possible to make them serializable so I can > > switch?, looking at the javadocs I assume it would be the logger adapter > > implementations, org.slf4j.spi.LocationAwareLogger and org.slf4j.Logger > > that would need the change. > >I don't think this is either necessary or desirable. If your classes are >Serializable, make the loggers transient and override readResolve() to >recreate/set the log instance. Cuts down on useless serialization overhead >too! Sounds pretty reasonable to me. Jeremy, would Holger's suggestion above work for you?
Implementing readResolve() for every class with a logger field is painful. Would there be any easier way? Of course, the easiest solution is not to use logger for serializable objects, which might make sense. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
_______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
