Hello Arthur, Thank you for your message. While I'd like to add a binding for log4j 1.1, the time spend into developing and maintaining this new binding would eat into higher priority items.
Nevertheless, I'd be happy to reference such a binding if your friend decided to write it. Best regards, Arthur Blake wrote: > Hi, I have a friend who was trying to get log4jdbc (my open source jdbc > logger that uses SLF4J - see http://log4jdbc.sourceforge.net) running > with ColdFusion MX 7. > > I have never used Cold Fusion myself, but apparently it is built on top > of Java, and uses a Log4j 1.1 logger. > > Therefore, he cannot use SLF4J with ColdFusion and it's built in Log4j > logger (because SLF4J only has a log4j 1.2 binding that doesn't work > with Log4j 1.1.) > > So, he has two options: 1. use some other logger side by side with > Log4j 1.1 or upgrade to Cold Fusion 8. > > However, Cold Fusion 8 has only been out for about a month or so, and he > says he won't be doing that anytime soon. > > I imagine there could be a very large Cold Fusion user base in that same > situation. > > I just want to suggest that you might want to create a Log4j 1.1 SLF4J > binding and include it in the official SLF4J distribution, if for no > other reason then to propogate SLF4J to the widest user base possible. > > I imagine this would be a very trivial thing to do (especially for Ceki > because he wrote all this stuff originally!) > > Arthur > -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
