I've used both XFire and CXF. In my opinion, CXF is actually quite good! It contains all the things I liked about XFire plus it has better standards compliance, and in my testing has been more interoperable with .NET clients too.
So, in my opinion, CXF is not only as good as XFire, but better! But... you really can't go wrong with either! -Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ceki Gulcu Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:35 PM To: User list for the slf4j project Subject: Re: [slf4j-user] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Level number 20 is not recognized. Thanks for the information. On a different register, I was quite impressed by Xfire. Is CXF as good? Christopher Moesel wrote: > Hi Ceki, > > I found my problem-- the CXF project had a reference to slf4j-jdk14 version > 1.3.1 in one of their POMs. So, it came in as a transitive dependency. As > it turns out, I didn't need that particular CXF module anyway (oops!) so I > removed it and now everything works! Great! Thanks! > > I'll pop an email over to the CXF folks to ask them to upgrade. > > -Chris -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
