It does. The applications works perfectly as a normal application or signed JNLP application.
Gili Ceki Gulcu-2 wrote: > > > Hello Gili, > > It's the first time I hear about this. So, if you sign the application, > does the > problem go away? Sounds unlikely if you ask me. > > > cowwoc wrote: >> Hi Ceki, >> >> When I try using slf4j + logback in an unsigned Webstart application I >> get: >> >> Logging factory implementation cannot be null. See also >> http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#null_LF >> >> I am using slf4j 1.5.5 and logback 0.9.11. I'd like to avoid having to >> sign >> this application if possible self-signed certificates scare off end-users >> and I don't think my application really needs other permissions. Any >> ideas? >> >> Gili > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for > Java. > http://logback.qos.ch > _______________________________________________ > user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-slf4j-in-unsigned-Webstart-Application-tp20495471p20501324.html Sent from the Slf4J - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
