On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG)< r.dan...@elsevier.com> wrote:
> Mostly I was just objecting to " Redshift does very well, but Shark is on > par or better than it in most of the tests " when that was not how I read > the results, and Redshift was on HDDs. My bad. You are correct; the only test Shark (mem) does better on is test #1 "Scan Query". And indeed, it would be good to see an updated benchmark with Redshift running on SSDs. Nick
