That might not be enough. Reflection is used to determine what the fields are, thus your class might actually need to have members corresponding to the fields in the table.
I heard that a more generic method of inputting stuff is coming. On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Tobias Pfeiffer <t...@preferred.jp> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Patrick McGloin <mcgloin.patr...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I think the type of the data contained in your RDD needs to be a known >> case class and not abstract for createSchemaRDD. This makes sense when you >> think it needs to know about the fields in the object to create the schema. > > > Exactly this. The actual message pointing to that is: > > "inferred type arguments [T] do not conform to method createSchemaRDD's > type parameter bounds [A <: Product]" > > All case classes are automatically subclasses of Product, but otherwise you > will have to extend Product and add the required methods yourself. > > Tobias > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org
