where is ignite's resilience/fault-tolerance design documented?
i can not find it. i would generally stay away from it if fault-tolerance
is an afterthought.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:31 AM, RodrigoB <rodrigo.boav...@aspect.com>
wrote:

> Although I haven't work explicitly with either, they do seem to differ in
> design and consequently in usage scenarios.
>
> Ignite is claimed to be a pure in-memory distributed database.
> With Ignite, updating existing keys is something that is self-managed
> comparing with Tachyon. In Tachyon once a value is created for a given key,
> becomes immutable, so you either delete and insert again, or need to
> manage/update the tachyon keys yourself.
> Also, Tachyon's resilience design is based on the underlying file system
> (typically hadoop), which means that if a node goes down, to recover the
> lost data, it would need first to have been persisted on the corresponding
> file partition.
> With Ignite, there is no master dependency like with Tachyon, and my
> understanding is that API calls will depend on master's availability in
> Tachyon. I believe Ignite has some options for replication which would be
> more aligned with the in-memory datastore.
>
> If you are looking for persisting some RDD's output into an in-memory store
> and query it outside of Spark, on the paper Ignite sounds like a better
> solution.
>
> Since you are asking about Ignite benefits that was the focus of my
> response. Tachyon has its own benefits like the community support and the
> Spark lineage persistency integration. If you are doing batch based
> processing and want to persist fast Spark RDDs, Tachyon is your friend.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Tnks,
> Rod
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Spark-on-Apache-Ingnite-tp25884p25933.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to