Yeah well... the prior was high... but don't have enough data on Mich to
have an accurate likelihood :-)
But ok, my bad, I continue with the preview stuff and leave this thread in
peace ^^
tx ted
cheers

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:47 PM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Andy:
> You should sense the tone in Mich's response.
>
> To my knowledge, there hasn't been an RC for the 2.0 release yet.
> Once we have an RC, it goes through the normal voting process.
>
> FYI
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:38 AM, andy petrella <andy.petre...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > tomorrow lunch time
>> Which TZ :-) → I'm working on the update of some materials that Dean
>> Wampler and myself will give tomorrow at Scala Days
>> <http://event.scaladays.org/scaladays-berlin-2016#!%23schedulePopupExtras-7601>
>>  (well
>> tomorrow CEST).
>>
>> Hence, I'm upgrading the materials on spark 2.0.0-preview, do you think
>> 2.0.0 will be released before 6PM CEST (9AM PDT)? I don't want to be a joke
>> in front of the audience with my almost cutting edge version :-P
>>
>> tx
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:59 PM Mich Talebzadeh <
>> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Tomorrow lunchtime.
>>>
>>> Btw can you stop spamming every big data forum about good interview
>>> questions book for big data!
>>>
>>> I have seen your mails on this big data book in spark, hive and tez
>>> forums and I am sure there are many others. That seems to be the only mail
>>> you send around.
>>>
>>> This forum is for technical discussions not for promotional material.
>>> Please confine yourself to technical matters
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LinkedIn * 
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 June 2016 at 12:45, Chaturvedi Chola <chaturvedich...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> when is the spark 2.0 release planned
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> andy
>>
>
> --
andy

Reply via email to