_shrug_ I think this is a bug fix, unless I am missing something here. You
shouldn't just use __TABLE__ for everything, and I'm not seeing a good
reason to do that other than it's what you do now.
I'm not clear if it's coming across that this _can't_ work in the general
case.

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:03 AM Daniel de Oliveira Mantovani <
daniel.oliveira.mantov...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> In this context, I don't want to worry about the name of the temporary
> table. That's why it is "__TABLE__".
> The point is that this behavior for Spark 3.2.x it's breaking back
> compatibility for all previous versions of Apache Spark. In my opinion we
> should at least have some flag like "spark.sql.legacy.keepSqlRecursive"
> true/false.
>

Reply via email to