PMML is not on our near-term roadmap. That being said, we'd welcome contributions that extend our system to support it.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Paco Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 ADMM > > Also, in terms of commercial adoption, is support for PMML on the roadmap? > > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Ameet Talwalkar <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Thanks for the clarification! Yes, we aim to add ADMM to MLI in the >> upcoming months. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Gowtham N <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Yes. It is the Stanford optimization algorithm. >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, August 17, 2013, Nat wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am tempted to think it is from >>>> http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/papers/pdf/admm_slides.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ameet Talwalkar < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our upcoming release will include the Alternating Least Squares >>>>> algorithm for Collaborative filtering. There are of course several other >>>>> techniques for CF (e.g., SGD-based, trace-norm, neighborhood methods, >>>>> divide-and-conquer approaches, etc.), and we hope that some of these >>>>> methods will be added, with initial implementations facilitated by the >>>>> high-level abstractions provided by the MLI. >>>>> >>>>> We are looking into adding neural network functionality (as noted in >>>>> my previous email). >>>>> >>>>> Could you explain what you mean by "ADM" -- I'm not familiar with that >>>>> acronym? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Gowtham N >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Is anyone working on neural networks, ADM, Collaborative Filtering >>>>>> etc? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Gowtham Natarajan >>> >> >> >
