The issue is I think we changed something where it went from having
good default behavior if you don't include a log4j.properties file to
having an error message. I think it depends how the user is running
Spark though, so I wanted to get specifics.

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Prashant Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think all that is needed is an log4j.properties on the classpath
> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Wenlei,
>>
>> There is some issue in master that is repressing the log output - I'm
>> trying to debug it before we release 0.8.1. Can you explain exactly
>> how you are running Spark? Are you running the shell or are you
>> running a standalone application?
>>
>> - Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Wenlei Xie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I remember Spark used to print detailed error log into the stderr (e.g.
>> > constructing RDD, evaluate it, how much memory each partition consumes).
>> > But
>> > I cannot find it anymore but only with the following information:
>> >
>> > SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
>> > SLF4J: Found binding in
>> >
>> > [jar:file:/u/ytian/wenlei/dynamicGraph/graphx/examples/target/scala-2.9.3/spark-examples-assembly-0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
>> > SLF4J: Found binding in
>> >
>> > [jar:file:/u/ytian/wenlei/dynamicGraph/graphx/assembly/target/scala-2.9.3/spark-assembly-0.9.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-hadoop1.0.4.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
>> > SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an
>> > explanation.
>> > SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory]
>> > log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
>> > (akka.event.slf4j.Slf4jEventHandler).
>> > log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
>> > log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for
>> > more info.
>> >
>> >
>> > What should I do for it?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Wenlei
>
>
>
>
> --
> s

Reply via email to