Yeah, only using numpy.  Strange, it must be an issue with my setup.  Will
let you know if I figure it out.

-Sandy


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Michael Ronquest <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sandy,
>         Are you just using numpy? numexpr (fast math for numpy arrays) has
> issues on workers.
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> On 12/19/2013 06:04 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
>
>> Verified that python is installed on the worker. When I simplify my job
>> I'm able to to get more stuff in stderr, but it's just the Java log4j
>> messages.
>>
>> I narrowed it down and I'm pretty sure the error is coming from my use of
>> numpy - I'm trying to pass around records that hold numpy arrays.  I've
>> verified that numpy is installed on the workers and that the job works
>> locally on the master.  Is there anything else I need to do for accessing
>> numpy from workers?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Sandy
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matei Zaharia 
>> <[email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     It might also mean you don’t have Python installed on the worker.
>>
>>     On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Jey Kottalam <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     > That's pretty unusual; normally the executor's stderr output would
>>     > contain a stacktrace and any other error messages from your Python
>>     > code. Is it possible that the PySpark worker crashed in C code
>>     or was
>>     > OOM killed?
>>     >
>>     > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sandy Ryza
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>     >> Hey All,
>>     >>
>>     >> Where are python logs in PySpark supposed to go?  My job is
>>     getting a
>>     >> org.apache.spark.SparkException: Python worker exited
>>     unexpectedly (crashed)
>>     >> but when I look at the stdout/stderr logs in the web UI,
>>     nothing interesting
>>     >> shows up (stdout is empty and stderr just has the spark
>>     executor command).
>>     >>
>>     >> Is this the expected behavior?
>>     >>
>>     >> thanks in advance for any guidance,
>>     >> Sandy
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to