Hi Naresh and Jens, Well first I tried running a job in local mode that was running good, but I wanted to run it in distributed environment, later I killed the job(Ctrl+c) and rebuild the jar with some addones in the bolts and made it to run in a production mode by StormSubmitter.submitTopology(.,.,.).
I am not sure what was the reason that the job was not able to run as I changed the build but soon after cluster restart the same distributed job started running. Now if I am killing the existing running job via terminal or via storm UI it kills pretty fine but Storm is over and over referencing the same old jar even thought I am making a fresh build. So the issue is somewhat referring this link http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/storm-dev/201408.mbox/%3CJIRA.12736289.1408831837060.8307.1409003698105@arcas%3E On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Naresh Kosgi <[email protected]> wrote: > When you killed the old topology with the old jar did you wait for the > timeout period? If you want to kill it right away use the -w 0 flag and > check the storm UI to make sure the job is gone, like Jens-U mentioned I > don't think ur looking at the right cause. I have done this in the past, > and deployed my topology before it was killed so just guessing this is what > you might be doing... > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Vineet Mishra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I am stucked at a vague issue. I am having a 3 node Storm >> Cluster(apache-storm-0.9.3) with configuration given below, >> >> node1 - Nimbus, UI >> node2 - Supervisor, Worker >> node3 - Supervisor, Worker >> >> I have written a topology and I was running it through storm, but soon >> after I made some changes in Bolts, created a fresh jar, redeployed it and >> ran again with the Storm jar command, but it still seems to be referring >> the old jar somewhere cached(although I have already deleted that old jar). >> >> I am seriously stucked at this issue, tried looking at some post relating >> the same issue but couldn't find any sufficing answer. >> >> Looking for expert comments. >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >
