Wouldn't that just be (transferred - acked)? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there a way with storm to get a value for the current number of tuples > that haven't been acked yet? > > > Thanks, >
Wouldn't that just be (transferred - acked)? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Vincent Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there a way with storm to get a value for the current number of tuples > that haven't been acked yet? > > > Thanks, >