+1.

We actually went through this painŠ
Not only did we separate them out, but we moved Zookeeper to physical
machines. (instead of virtual)
If this is a production system, I would keep them separate and stick with
the 9.

-brian

---
Brian O'Neill 
Chief Technology Officer
Health Market Science, a LexisNexis Company
215.588.6024 Mobile € @boneill42 <http://www.twitter.com/boneill42>


This information transmitted in this email message is for the intended
recipient only and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you received this email in error and are not the intended recipient, or the
person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, please contact
the sender at the email above and delete this email and any attachments and
destroy any copies thereof. Any review, retransmission, dissemination,
copying or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon, this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited.
 


From:  Harsha <[email protected]>
Reply-To:  <[email protected]>
Date:  Monday, March 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM
To:  "<Adaryl Bob  Wakefield>", MBA <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: Lamda architecture and multi-tenancy

Adaryl,
            IMO I would suggest you to go with 9 machines . The reason being
both Kafka and Zookeeper are disk intensive putting both on the same machine
is risky and not a best practice. Also Storm & Kafka  both are heavy users
zookeeper i.e frequent updates and reads from zookeeper. Having all of them
on the same machines is risky and performance will suffer.

-Harsha
 

> 
> 
> 
> On March 8, 2015 at 11:26:05 PM, Adaryl Bob Wakefield, MBA
> ([email protected]) wrote:
>> 
>> Let¹s say you put together a real time streaming solution using Storm, Kafka,
>> and the necessary Zookeeper and whatever storage tech you decide. Is it true
>> that these applications are so resource intensive that they all need to live
>> by themselves on their own machine? Put another way, for the ingestion
>> portion, is the minimum number of machines required here 9?
>>  
>> Adaryl "Bob" Wakefield, MBA
>> Principal
>> Mass Street Analytics, LLC
>> 913.938.6685
>> www.linkedin.com/in/bobwakefieldmba
>> Twitter: @BobLovesData


Reply via email to