Using cloudera CDH 5.3,  that has hive 0.13 onwards.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, 10:34 AM Harsha <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Sunit,
>      Which version of Hive are you using. Hive streaming supported from
> 0.13 onwards.
> Here is the doc for enabling hive streaming. checking streaming
> requirements
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Streaming+Data+Ingest
>
> After that you can refer to the doc here
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/external/storm-hive/README.md
>
>
> --
> Harsha
>
> On March 17, 2015 at 9:39:44 PM, Sunit Swain ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> I am using storm 0.9.3 and trying to make use of the HiveBolt to stream
> the data directly into hive tables.
>
> I am following this example:
> https://github.com/hkropp/storm-hive-streaming-example
>
> But instead of a kafkaspout I am using a random data generating spout to
> keep things simple.
>
> When I submit the topology, the bolt thread is able to connect to my
> hive-metastore but then fails with these  errors
> once it was: *" Non-local session path expected to be non-null"*
> and then  :* "Failed connecting to EndPoint hive " *
>
> I also made sure that the table is already created and accessible. I also
> tried it on partitioned and un-partitioned  tables.
>
> Any help as to what is going wrong?
>
> Regards,
> Sunit
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Sunit Swain <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am using storm 0.9.3 and trying to make use of the HiveBolt to stream
>> the data directly into hive tables.
>>
>> I am following this example:
>> https://github.com/hkropp/storm-hive-streaming-example
>>
>> But instead of a kafkaspout I am using a random data generating spout to
>> keep things simple.
>>
>> When I submit the topology, the bolt thread is able to connect to my
>> hive-metastore but then fails with these  errors
>> once it was: *" Non-local session path expected to be non-null"*
>> and then  :* "Failed connecting to EndPoint hive " *
>>
>> I also made sure that the table is already created and accessible. I also
>> tried it on partitioned and un-partitioned  tables.
>>
>> Any help as to what is going wrong?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sunit
>>
>
>

Reply via email to