Having a worker and nimbus on the same host should not be a problem.

We have seen this exact thing happen when two nimbus daemons are operating on 
the same file system location (sometimes an NFS mount).


The other thing that comes to mind is ZooKeeper configuration.  Make sure all 
of the ZooKeeper hosts are part of the same ZooKeeper cluster.
 
-- 
Derek 



________________________________
From: S. Zhou <[email protected]>
To: Derek Dagit <[email protected]> 
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: storm failed to activate topology



Only one nimbus is running. Another thing: I run nimbus and worker on the same 
machine using "distributed" mode. I am not sure if it could be an issue. 



On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 10:13 AM, Derek Dagit <[email protected]> wrote:



Check for a second nimbus process running somehow.  There should be only one at 
a time.
 
-- 
Derek 



________________________________
From: S. Zhou <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; yuanjun Li 
<[email protected]>; S. Zhou <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: storm failed to activate topology



Another thing I observed while investigating is:

when I run "storm jar" command, it creates a directory 
"Mytopology-2-1427302545" under "nimbus/stormdist". In that directory it has 3 
files "stormcode.ser  stormconf.ser  stormjar.jar"

But after a while, these three files and the directory 
"Mytopology-2-1427302545" are disappeared. I tried to manually create that 
directory and copied back these three files, they are deleted (I guess by 
storm) again.

 



On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 7:52 AM, S. Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:



output from "storm list"
0    [main] INFO  backtype.storm.thrift  - Connecting to Nimbus at 
localhost:6627
No topologies running.




On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:53 PM, yuanjun Li <[email protected]> wrote:



use ./storm list to list your top status.


2015-03-25 9:52 GMT+08:00 S. Zhou <[email protected]>:

I used "storm jar" first actually. Then the topology was active for a short 
period time then it dies. I checked log files from nimbus, ui, supervisor and 
worker and found no error message. 
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 5:43 PM, Nathan Leung <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>
>
>Is the topology already running?  Given the exception I suspect not.  You will 
>need to load it to the cluster using "storm jar ...".  Activate should only be 
>used if the topology is already loaded to the cluster and deactivated (i.e. 
>spouts are not calling nextTuple).
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:07 PM, S. Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I was running this command "./storm activate MyTopology" and got the following 
>exception. I looked through storm log files and could not see any clues. Any 
>hints? Thanks!
>>
>>
>>We are using storm 0.8.0 on Ubuntu Lucid (10.04).
>>
>>
>>0    [main] INFO  backtype.storm.thrift  - Connecting to Nimbus at 
>>localhost:6627
>>Exception in thread "main" NotAliveException(msg:MyTopology)
>>    at backtype.storm.generated.Nimbus$activate_result.read(Nimbus.java:4188)
>>    at org.apache.thrift7.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:78)
>>    at backtype.storm.generated.Nimbus$Client.recv_activate(Nimbus.java:210)
>>    at backtype.storm.generated.Nimbus$Client.activate(Nimbus.java:197)
>>    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>    at 
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>    at 
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
>>    at clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeMatchingMethod(Reflector.java:93)
>>    at clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeInstanceMethod(Reflector.java:28)
>>    at backtype.storm.command.activate$_main.invoke(activate.clj:7)
>>    at clojure.lang.AFn.applyToHelper(AFn.java:161)
>>    at clojure.lang.AFn.applyTo(AFn.java:151)
>>    at backtype.storm.command.activate.main(Unknown Source)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to