Can't you have zookeeper spawning data centers if there is connectivity.

Enlarge zookeeper to more than 3 nodes and extra nodes from other data
centers and
also minimum replication to be set.


On 8/28/15, Rick Mangi <[email protected]> wrote:
> As long as you are replicating kafka and your offset checkpoints in the
> secondary datacenter you should be able to do this. The offsets into kafka
> from your spout tell you where you are in your processing (as long as your
> topology is acking).
>
> That said, if those offsets are in zookeeper you will need to find a way to
> replicate those to your failover datacenter.
>
>> On Aug 27, 2015, at 3:08 PM, nitin sharma <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> hi Andrew,
>>
>> our setup includes Kafka --> Storm --> Cassandra ..
>>
>> we want to have a backup cluster for Storm, so that in case of any outage
>> the backup server (topology) picks up from where Active server topology
>> stopped and process the events and sends them to Cassandra.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nitin Kumar Sharma.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Andrew Xor <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> I can try and give you some ideas, but start by first telling us how
>> you've setup your infrastructure a bit so we can better help you...
>>
>> Kindly yours,
>>
>> Andrew Grammenos
>>
>> -- PGP PKey --
>> ​ <https://www.dropbox.com/s/2kcxe59zsi9nrdt/pgpsig.txt>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yxvycjvlsc111bh/pgpsig.txt
>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ei2nqsen641daei/pgpsig.txt>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:28 PM, nitin sharma <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have been asked how can we setup a failover datacenter for Storm, so
>> that if by any chance (lets say due to power outages) the complete Active
>> datacenter becomes offline then Standby Datacenter can become alive and
>> process the real time feeds.
>>
>> Does anyone have faced this kind of scenario? what are the best practice
>> to follow?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nitin Kumar Sharma.
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to