Hello Kashyap,

I have come up with something similar before. However, I have not yet
figured out how I can avoid these kind of Exceptions.

Nick

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Kashyap Mhaisekar <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
> To fix Netty reconnect issues, I upgraded to 0.9.5 of storm and it worked
> well in one environment. While in stress environment, i noticed the below.
> My Dev env has 5 boxes as a cluster while stress env has 8 boxes. Has
> anyone come across this before?
> -----------------------------
> 2015-09-24T04:12:32.034-0500 b.s.m.n.StormClientErrorHandler [INFO]
> Connection failed Netty-Client-myserver1.myorg.com/10.2.72.70:6702
> java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
>         at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)
> ~[na:1.7.0_79]
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)
> ~[na:1.7.0_79]
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)
> ~[na:1.7.0_79]
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:192) ~[na:1.7.0_79]
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:379)
> ~[na:1.7.0_79]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.read(NioWorker.java:64)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.process(AbstractNioWorker.java:108)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioSelector.run(AbstractNioSelector.java:318)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.run(AbstractNioWorker.java:89)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.run(NioWorker.java:178)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.util.ThreadRenamingRunnable.run(ThreadRenamingRunnable.java:108)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> org.apache.storm.netty.util.internal.DeadLockProofWorker$1.run(DeadLockProofWorker.java:42)
> [storm-core-0.9.5.jar:0.9.5]
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> [na:1.7.0_79]
>         at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> [na:1.7.0_79]
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.7.0_79]
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks
> Kashyap
>



-- 
Nikolaos Romanos Katsipoulakis,
University of Pittsburgh, PhD student

Reply via email to