live talk on Apache Storm for those interested 
https://www.periscope.tv/w/1vOGwnDLblvKB

@scottccote

SCott
Scott C. Cote
[email protected]
972.672.6484



> On Oct 5, 2015, at 6:45 PM, Enno Shioji <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If you are doing unnecessary repartitioning (sending tuples to remote 
> processes) now and if you can remove/reduce that, that could help a lot. That 
> said it's not obvious to me if that's the case here (e.g. is Kafka 
> partitioned in a way you could exploit it to reduce repatriating?).
> 
> If the above is not the case, it's not clear to me why it should help, 
> because it's just the same work being done in a different place. I think it 
> won't hurt to try though.
> 
> Another thing you could try is to combine Bolt 1 and Bolt 2 to one bolt. 
> That's what Trident tries to do by default for optimization.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 16:38, Javier Gonzalez <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> If you get one bolt2 per worker, it should work as you say. Though I'm not 
>> completely sure it's *guaranteed* that every mesage will go local.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Javier
>> 
>> On Oct 5, 2015 10:01 AM, "John Yost" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi Javier,
>> 
>> I apologize, I don't think I am making myself clear. I am attempting to get 
>> all the tuples for a given key sent to the same Bolt 2 executor instance. I 
>> previously followed the pattern of using fieldsGrouping on Bolt1 as this is 
>> a well-established pattern.  However, there are roughly 4 times as many Bolt 
>> 1 executors to every Bolt 2 executor, and I was finding the throughput was 
>> very low between Bolts 1 and 2.  Once I switched to localOrShuffleGrouping 
>> between Bolt 1 and Bolt 2, the throughput tripled. I did this based upon 
>> advice from this board to do localOrShuffleGrouping for large fan-in 
>> patterns like this (great advice, definitely worked great!).
>> 
>> Unfortunately, this also means that there is no guarantee that all tuples 
>> for a given key will be sent to the same Bolt 2. To hopefully get the best 
>> of both worlds, I am thinking I can do the fieldsGrouping between KafkaSpout 
>> and Bolt 1, and therefore I get the same effect of all tuples for a given 
>> key going to the same Bolt 2. Of course, the key (pun intended) is that 
>> there is one Bolt 2 per worker, which will ensure all tuples for the same 
>> key will go to the same Bolt 1 which will then forward 'em to Bolt 2.
>> 
>> Please confirm if this seems logical and that it should work. I think it 
>> should, but I may be missing something.
>> 
>> Thanks! :)
>> 
>> --John
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Javier Gonzalez <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> If I'm reading this correctly, I think you're not getting the result you 
>> want - having all tuples with a given key processed in the same bolt2 
>> instance.
>> 
>> If you want to have all messages of a given key to be processed in the same 
>> Bolt2, you need to do fields grouping from bolt1 to bolt2. By doing fields 
>> grouping in the spout-bolt1 hop and shuffle/local in the bolt1-bolt2 hop, 
>> you're ensuring that bolt1 instances always see the same key, but is there 
>> any guarantee that the bolt2 you want is the nearest/only local bolt 
>> available to any given instance of bolt1?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Javier
>> 
>> On Oct 5, 2015 7:33 AM, "John Yost" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> I am currently prototyping FieldsGrouping at the KafkaSpout vs Bolt level. I 
>> am curious as to whether anyone else has tried this and, if so, how well 
>> this worked.
>> 
>> The reason I am attempting to do FieldsGrouping in the KafkaSpout is that I 
>> moved from fieldsGrouping to localOrShuffleGrouping between Bolt 1 and Bolt 
>> 2 in my topology due to a 4 to 1 fan in from Bolt 1 to Bolt 2 (for example, 
>> 200 Bolt 1 executors and 50 Bolt 2 executors) which was dramatically slowing 
>> throughput. It is still highly preferable to do fieldsGrouping one way or 
>> another so that I am getting all values for a given key to the same Bolt 2 
>> executor, which is the impetus for attempting to do fieldsGrouping in the 
>> KafkaSpout.
>> 
>> If anyone has any thoughts on this approach, I'd very much like to get your 
>> thoughts.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> --John
>> 

Reply via email to