Please disregard the mail with the subject line: Working
Kafka->Trident->Cassandra Example? Anyone?  I think I have found some
examples that will help me.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Craig Charleton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I usually am determined enough to push through the learning when it comes
> to new frameworks, etc.  However, making the move from Storm to Trident has
> melted my brain.  Even though I have already developed Kakfa/Avro/Storm the
> Trident documentation leaves me chasing answers/examples in circles.
>
> *"the word counts are kept in memory, but this can be trivially swapped to
> use Memcached, Cassandra, or any other persistent store."*  Yet it seems
> anything but trivial when attempted in the case of Cassandra.
>
> *"Suppose you have a home-grown database..." *Do people write their own
> databases?  Has this example ever been used anywhere?  Is this something I
> should be doing?
>
> I know how bad it looks to be complaining about documentation on an open
> source project that is so totally awesome.  However, I believe that most
> users are going to use Trident primarily, if not exclusively, for the
> AtMostOnceProcessing which depends on the persistence of state to something
> like Cassandra (as mentioned in the docs).  So far, all of the information
> I have consumed (online and in book form) has missing pieces that make,
> what I believe to be, a VERY common configuration/use-case very difficult
> to dissect.  Kafka->Trident->Cassandra
>
> I was hoping that someone could share a working example of a Trident
> Topology that
>
>    1. Persists state to Cassandra so that AtMostOnce can be guaranteed.
>    2. Has a working implementation of an IOpaqueParitionedTridentSpout
>    that reads from a Kafka Topic.
>
>
> I am sorry to come off like a jerk.  I know there is something small that
> my tiny brain cannot conceptualize about Trident.  The Storm docs are
> great!  I am just getting desperate in trying to find the elusive
> Kafka->Trident->Cassandra example.
>
> I will share back what I am able to synthesize from your kind donation of
> knowledge.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to