I think typically in a production environment you would use the releases/versions released as being "stable" vs building from the latest code checked into source control. Storm 0.9.x for sure is used by tons of large enterprise companies -- 0.10.x doesn't seem like a huge departure from 0.9.x as far as writing topologies go (in testing our topologies didn't require changing any code going from 0.9.x to 0.10.x - we plan on upgrading in the next few weeks).
Developers can chime in, but from my personal experience with Storm I wouldn't exactly focus on the "1.0" labeling so much as the software being consistent and stable from release to release. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Maciek Próchniak <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any timeline for 1.0 release? > We're evaluating Storm (together with Flink) for our client and it'd be > great for us to have sliding window support. > Guess we could use version built from sources for some time - but we still > need some estimates on 1.0 availability. > > thanks, > maciek > >
