hi Anshu. Can you please clarify what is "not clear" to you in the description?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:31 AM, anshu shukla <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Xiang, > > I have read it already . But I am not clear about this point - > > > 1. *Local or shuffle grouping: If the target bolt has one or more > tasks in the same worker process, tuples will be shuffled to just those > in-process tasks. Otherwise, this acts like a normal shuffle grouping* > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Xiang Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please have a look at this page: >> http://storm.apache.org/releases/0.10.0/Concepts.html >> >> There are many different grouping methods, and direct grouping may be >> what you are looking for. >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> Xiang Wang PhD Candidate >> Database Research Group >> School of Computer Science and Engineering >> The University of New South Wales >> Sydney, Australia >> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:14 AM, anshu shukla <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Suppose we have 10 exec/threads of spouts sending tuples to 5 threads of >>> downstream bolt (say B) .Then my question is - >>> >>> *Does every thread of spout will uniformly distribute messages to all >>> the 5 threads of downstream nodes .* >>> >>> *Or * >>> >>> *Is there any one to one communication btw spouts exec to bolts .* >>> >>> >>> Very relevant if we want to improve N/W cost by custom scheduler in >>> storm. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Anshu Shukla >>> >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Anshu Shukla >
