@Huo: Yes, so the fact that 20 were ack'ed in spouts 1, 2 and 3, should mean that the emits should have also been shown as 20. But the emits are being shown as 0. One person says only 5% of data is shown by the UI: http://stackoverflow.com/a/36204192/453673 But still, it is a bit odd that the emits didn't show up. btw, the second time the spout emits via allGrouping, it does so in a separate stream.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Hao Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > It only displays numbers reached 20 at least, and increased per 20. > > > > > > *Hao Wang* | Head, Software R&D Dept, 3M Cogent Beijing > Traffic Safety and Security Division > Suite 708, Ideal Plaza, No.58, West Road North 4th Ring rd, Haidian > District | Beijing, 100080 > Office: +86 (10) 82551288-5131 | FAX: +86 (10) 82551289 > * [email protected] <[email protected]>* | > www.3M.com/IdentityManagement <http://www.3m.com/> > > > > *From:* Navin Ipe [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 2016年5月31日 20:03 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Common for storm UI to not show emits? > > > > Hi, > > Screenshot: > > > I confirmed from the logs that all spouts were emitting and ack'ing. > Strangely, the UI doesn't show it. *Moreover, Spout 1, 2 and 3 show no > emissions but there are ack's. Is it common for Storm to show results like > this?* > > Here, 10 spouts emit to a bolt (which run as 4 tasks) via fieldsGrouping. > The bolt ack's. After each spout receives 20 ack's from the bolt, the spout > emits to the bolt again using allGrouping. > > > -- > > Regards, > > Navin > > > > > > 3M security scanners have not detected any malicious content in this message. > Click here > <https://spam.mmm.com:443/pem/pages/digestProcess/digestProcess.jsf?content=aedaaa864ecbae9425bd9f0fec3cc4baa0959ae20523b741424af0ff6ccdc730c6c4ff5fb22097b592aab29dac82584fe2bc968480472c3eaabba21033a097db11a5bbae84d10e1a556545982ab95098bea2122fdc521a91c1dce4ef9255fbd0412876d25c0b9f9fcc7f23363904a84a672a7c8cec8e8b690588a0338b0f59c59e2c19dcd14a0779> > to report this email as spam > > > > > -- Regards, Navin
