Since Kafka 0.9+ introduces the new consumer clients (Zookeeper-less consumer 
offsets) and TLS support, it would be nice to see Storm support both. 

Sent via iPhone

> On Jun 29, 2016, at 06:37, Rama Nallamilli <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This first line on the page says:
> Provides core Storm and Trident spout implementations for consuming data from 
> Apache Kafka 0.8.x.
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood but that statement to me implies that it is only for 
> Kafka 0.8.x.  Either-way thanks for clearing that up, will give it a shot 
> with a newer version.
> 
> Regards
> Rama
> 
>> On 29 June 2016 at 11:36, Abhishek Agarwal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Rama,
>> I don't see it mentioned anywhere that only a particular version is 
>> supported. storm-kafka is compiled against kafka 0.8. So long the interfaces 
>> are available in newer kafka versions, it should work seamlessly. Make sure 
>> you put the correct dependency of kafka in your pom and exclude any kafka 
>> dependencies coming out of storm-kafka.
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Rama Nallamilli <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Thanks for clarifying Abhishek.  Link here: 
>>> http://storm.apache.org/releases/1.0.1/storm-kafka.html 
>>> 
>>>> On 29 June 2016 at 11:01, Abhishek Agarwal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> can you point me to the link which suggests so? storm-kafka should work 
>>>> with any version of kafka client. 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Rama Nallamilli <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was wondering if Storm Kafka integration is compatible with the newer 
>>>>> versions of Kafka (0.9.x and 0.10.x).  The website documentation suggests 
>>>>> it is only compatible with 0.8.x.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the integration compatible with the newer versions or would the 
>>>>> storm-kafka project need to be forked/rebuilt with the latest kafka 
>>>>> clients?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Rama
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Abhishek Agarwal
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Abhishek Agarwal
> 

Reply via email to