In your storm.yaml configuration on each supervisor machine, if you set 
“storm.local.hostname” to the Infiniband IP that should do what you want.

-Taylor


> On Nov 4, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Muhammad Haseeb Javed <11besemja...@seecs.edu.pk> 
> wrote:
> 
> That is definitely a plausible solution but not the one that would apply to 
> my case as it is a shared user cluster with me only having basic, non-root 
> access to it. I can not even do a sudo on it, let alone disable network 
> interconnects. Do you have any other solution in mind, be it complex, by 
> which this could be done?
> 
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Matt Foley <mfo...@hortonworks.com 
> <mailto:mfo...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> Sorry if this is too crude, but the simplest answer is to disable one network 
> at a time, on all the servers in the cluster.  This can be done in software, 
> with a usually minor edit of the OS configuration files (which ones depends 
> on the particular linux you’re running) then restarting the network services. 
>  Rebooting is not usually required.
> 
>  
> 
> I’m assuming that, since you’re running benchmarks, you have dedicated 
> hardware that you can tweak as desired.
> 
>  
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> --Matt
> 
>  
> 
> From: Muhammad Haseeb Javed <11besemja...@seecs.edu.pk 
> <mailto:11besemja...@seecs.edu.pk>>
> Reply-To: "user@storm.apache.org <mailto:user@storm.apache.org>" 
> <user@storm.apache.org <mailto:user@storm.apache.org>>
> Date: Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 10:49 PM
> To: "user@storm.apache.org <mailto:user@storm.apache.org>" 
> <user@storm.apache.org <mailto:user@storm.apache.org>>
> Subject: Storm over both Ethernet and Infiniband on the same cluster
> 
>  
> 
> I am trying to benchmark performance differences for Storm when run on 
> Ehternet compared to an Infiniband network. I have a cluster in which all 
> nodes are connected through both Ethernet and Infiniband. 
> 
>  
> 
> But I am lost as to how to configure Storm to perform communication over 
> Infiniband in one case and Ethernet in another. From what I understand, Storm 
> does not allow us to specify the IPs of slave (supervisor) nodes, or else we 
> could have just entered the address if Inifininand interconnect there.
> 
> 

Reply via email to