Thanks a lot

Regards
Shubham Gupta

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <s...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'm basing this off of later Storm versions, because I'm not familiar with
> 0.9, so buyer beware. As far as I know the logic hasn't changed though, so
> I'll be linking to the 2.0.0 classes.
>
> 1. No, you don't need to ack or fail unanchored tuples. Storm isn't
> keeping track of those tuples at all. Here's the OutputCollector
> implementation for bolts in 2.0.0 https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/
> ffa607e2464a361a8f2fa548cc8043f5a8818d04/storm-client/src/
> jvm/org/apache/storm/executor/bolt/BoltOutputCollectorImpl.java#L128. As
> you can see, if you call ack or fail on a tuple with no anchors, nothing
> really happens.
>
> 2. If the tuple is anchored at the spout (i.e. the spout emitted the tuple
> with a message id), then yes. If you want to disable acking globally, you
> can do so by setting topology.acker.executors to 0
> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/ffa607e2464a361a8f2fa548cc8043
> f5a8818d04/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/Config.java#L375 setting.
>
> 2018-03-12 20:34 GMT+01:00 Shubham Gupta <shubham.gu...@sizmek.com>:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a few doubts regarding storm reliability mechanism :
>> - Do we need to ack (or fail) unanchored tuples ?
>> - Is is always necessary to ack or fail every tuple received from the
>> spout in the first bolt to avoid Out of Memory error in Storm ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Regards
>> Shubham Gupta
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to