Thanks for the fix.  I just merged them in.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:50 AM Michal Koziorowski <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> I've created PRs for:
>
> master: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2846
>
> 1.1.x: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2847
>
> and 1.x: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2848
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michal
>
> W dniu 21.09.2018 o 17:41, Bobby Evans pisze:
>
> You also need to make sure you submit a patch to master.
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:02 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good. Yes, 1.x-branch is for 1.2.x.
>>
>> Den fre. 21. sep. 2018 kl. 09.25 skrev Michal Koziorowski <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I created issue for updating zookeeper client (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3233).
>>>
>>> Next week, I will try to submit PRs for current storm and 1.1.x and
>>> 1.2.x.
>>>
>>> I see 1.1.x-branch on git. Which one is for 1.2.x. Is it 1.x-branch?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Michal
>>>
>>> W dniu 20.09.2018 o 16:30, Stig Rohde Døssing pisze:
>>>
>>> I don't think there are any open issues/PRs to do it, but I don't see
>>> why we couldn't upgrade. Feel free to raise an issue at
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira, and if you want to contribute the
>>> patch, please submit a PR to https://github.com/apache/storm/pulls. You
>>> can find a guide on how to develop Storm here
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/DEVELOPER.md.
>>>
>>> Den tor. 20. sep. 2018 kl. 09.58 skrev Michal Koziorowski <
>>> [email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Question to devs.
>>>> Are there any plans to upgrade zookeeper used in Storm? In newest
>>>> 3.4.13 release, there is a fix for cloud environments where zookeeper
>>>> servers have dynamic ips (
>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2184). We would really
>>>> want to see zookeeper upgraded to remove some of ugly hacks existing on our
>>>> servers made to override zookeeper dynamic ips problems.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Michal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to