Thank you very much. Your email to Nathan has helped !!  Nathan got in touch 
with the PMC.

Yes blogs will be coming. BTW: newer configs have been explained here 
https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/docs/Performance.md

-roshan


On Friday, June 14, 2019, 2:07:30 AM PDT, Petr Janeček <[email protected]> 
wrote: 





Oh! In that case please update the readme doc on github - it still points to 
the old one (which has, therefore, a much bigger audience):
"Storm has a website at storm.apache.org. Follow @stormprocessor on Twitter for 
updates on the project."

I've sent a separate email to mr. Marz, he seems to have been active on Github 
recently, perhaps he'll donate 20 minutes to Storm, too.

PJ

P.S. Congrats to the 2.0.0 release, we're playing with it already and the 
results are encouraging! Looking forward to seeing the explanatory blog posts - 
mainly because of some possible new configuration options?


---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: Roshan Naik <[email protected]>
Komu: [email protected]
Datum: 11. 6. 2019 22:02:30
Předmět: Re: Apache Storm Twitter account 
> 
> 
> Thats the old account owned by Nathan Marz. He doesn't seem active on it. I 
> believe ... due to not hearing back from Nathan ... the PMC had to create 
> another  Storm twitter account which is currently active  
> https://twitter.com/apachestorm 
> 
> I think would be a good idea if the two accounts can be merged somehow ... if 
> nathan can be reached. 
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  On Tuesday, June 11, 2019, 7:06:42 AM PDT, Andrew Xor 
><[email protected]> wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I think that's a really good idea especially now that storm 2.0 is upon us 
> and it brings quite a few goodies along with it.
> 
> It seems most of the storm hype has migrated to flink ;) (including myself :()
> 
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:20 PM Petr Janeček <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> the "official" Storm Twitter account - https://twitter.com/stormprocessor - 
>> seems to be abandoned.
>> 
>> Is there anyone still holding credentials for it? Perhaps it would be nice 
>> to either start using it again (by announcing 2.0.0 there), or disable it 
>> altogether so that random lurkers do not think Storm is completely dead...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> PJ
> 
> 

Reply via email to