On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:25:32PM +0530, Srinath C wrote: > The current running workers will not get affected but if any of the worker > processes crash, they will not get relaunched - basically the topology will > remain disfunctional until the supervisor is started again and it re-spawns > the > worker process.
Yeah, thanks, the situation I suppose is the worker alive, but the supervisor died, so there is no need to re-launch worker process[es]. What will be hurt if I left the supervisor dead? -- Thanks, Chengwei > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Chengwei Yang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi List, > > I see the storm fault-tolerance page said that the storm supervisor is > stateless and so as it can be just restarted after fail. > > I'm wondering if the fail supervisor will not be restarted, what will > happening? Is the only side-effect is that the nimbus can not ask the > *failed* supervisor to start worker anymore, so some kind of wast of > resource, is this true? Does it hurt current running worker? > > -- > Thanks, > Chengwei > >
