It's hard to make a comparison without knowing exactly how their tests were written. Especially being from the company of the product being recognized as "superior". Storm is still young in the larger community and I certainly think there's place for it to grow.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Jon Logan <[email protected]> wrote: > The claims are certainly interesting...I haven't looked through it super > detailed, but I would definitely keep in mind who is making the claims. > Looking at it briefly, it looks like something is really wrong, looking at > their scaling graphs. Without further information, I think it's hard to > properly analyze their results, especially coming from a competing vendor. > > > I don't know where this 40k figure comes from...coming from IBM's own > cost-analysis paper, the pricing is more like starting at 500k, and easily > going 1mil+. > > http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/ime14024usen/IME14024USEN.PDF > > > It would be interesting if they posted their source code, to see if > they're doing something silly, or if anyone could rectify their performance > issues. Otherwise, I think it's fair to assume this is potentially a > "novice" versus "first-party supported expert" comparisons of > implementations. > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Anybody who has ever only paid 40K$ to IBM for anything should deserve a >> prize. That is just the entry fee. >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Marc Vaillant >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> To play devil's advocate, if you believe the stream performance gains, >>> then the 40k will likely pay for itself in needing to deploy a fraction >>> of the resources for the same throughput. >>> >>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:02:53AM -0400, John Welcher wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > Streams also cost 40,000 US while Storm is free. >>> > >>> > John >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Klausen Schaefersinho < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I found some interesting comparison of IBM Stream and Storm: >>> > >>> > https://www.ibmdw.net/streamsdev/2014/04/22/streams-apache-storm/ >>> > >>> > It also includes an interesting comparison between ZeroMQ and the >>> Netty >>> > Performance. >>> > >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Klaus >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >
