Just curious - is there a ballpark ETA for 0.9.2?

> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:51:30 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Kryo
> 
> And to add to what Osman said, the upcoming Storm 0.9.2 version will be
> using Kryo 2.21.  There are two main reasons:  first, Kryo 2.21 fixes
> potential data corruption issues of prior Kryo versions;  second,
> updating to 2.21 syncs Storm's Kryo dependency with other, "nice to
> have" libraries for data processing such as Twitter Chill/Bijection.
> 
> FYI:  Kryo is not tracked as a direct dependency in Storm's pom.xml [1].
>  Instead it is pulled in as a transitive dependency of Carbonite [2],
> which is a Clojure library for working with Kryo.  And Carbonite 1.4.0
> requires Kryo 2.21 [3].
> 
> Here are the relevant snippets in Storm's pom.xml:
> 
>     <carbonite.version>1.4.0</carbonite.version>
> 
>     <dependency>
>         <groupId>com.twitter</groupId>
>         <artifactId>carbonite</artifactId>
>         <version>${carbonite.version}</version>
>     </dependency>
> 
> You can also run
> 
>     $ mvn dependency:tree
> 
> in the top-level directory in the git repository to generate the
> dependency tree of Storm.  (You may need to run `mvn install` first,
> otherwise e.g. storm-starter will complain about not finding
> 0.9.2-SNAPSHOT jars.)
> 
> Best,
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/blob/master/pom.xml
> [2] https://github.com/sritchie/carbonite
> [3] https://github.com/sritchie/carbonite/blob/1.4.0/project.clj#L8
> 
> 
> On 01/29/2014 12:36 PM, Osman wrote:
> > 0.9.0.1 is using kryo/2.17
> > <http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.esotericsoftware.kryo/kryo/2.17> 
> > 
> > 
> > On 29 January 2014 11:24, Klausen Schaefersinho
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > 
> >     Hi,
> > 
> >     which version of kryo is used in Storm? I have an dependency which
> >     also uses kryo and thus I have some runtime issues! I was looking
> >     into the pom.xml but could find it.
> > 
> >     Cheers,
> > 
> >     klaus
> 
                                          

Reply via email to