https://storm.incubator.apache.org/documentation/FAQ.html


On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:26 AM, 唐 思成 <[email protected]> wrote:

> that really helps,thx a lot
> 在 2014年7月5日,下午8:35,Eugene <[email protected]> 写道:
>
> The best tool for topology tuning is Storm UI. Here you can learn your
> process latency and capacity of your storm components.
> Start with some baseline, for example, having all parallelism setting to
> 1. Then gradually increase parallelism until you see capacity numbers well
> below 1.0.
> In general, try to increase number of executors first, before increasing
> number of workers. When increasing number of executors (threads) does not
> give any
> improvements, then start adding additional workers. Also, if your
> components more IO bound then increasing number of task helps as well.
>
> In addition to Storm UI,and resources Francesco pointed out,  you can use
> storm metrics API to send data to graphite.
> http://www.michael-noll.com/blog/2013/11/06/sending-metrics-from-storm-to-graphite/
>
> Upcoming book, Storm Applied  <http://www.manning.com/sallen/> has a
> chapter about tuning Storm (chapter 6).
>
> Thanks
> Eugene Dvorkin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 7:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  i ' ve found some good advices reading these articles
>>
>>
>> http://www.michael-noll.com/blog/2013/06/21/understanding-storm-internal-message-buffers/
>>
>>
>> http://www.michael-noll.com/blog/2012/10/16/understanding-the-parallelism-of-a-storm-topology/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il 2014-07-05 12:12 唐思成 ha scritto:
>>
>> everyone, do you have some best practice or pattern for tunning the storm
>> cluster, like how to set the number of workers, the numbers of spout and
>> bolts, etc..
>> Any advice is welcome.
>>
>> 2014-07-05
>> ------------------------------
>> 唐思成
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Eugene Dvorkin
> Software Engineer
> New York City Storm User Group - organizer
> WebMD
> email: [email protected]
> phone: 646-250-9649
> eugenedvorkin.com
> Connect with me on:
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenedvorkin> Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/edvorkin>
>
>
>

Reply via email to