Frank, which xml nodes are you talking about? The msg and arg nodes in the validation.xml fields? I am getting SAXParseExceptions saying that bundle is not accepted here.

Adam

On 04/06/2004 01:59 PM Otto, Frank wrote:
Hi,

The bundle attribute of msg and arg tag works fine in your application?


Regards,


Frank

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. April 2004 10:42
An: Struts Users Mailing List
Betreff: Re: SV: validation with struts 1.2


If these things are not already logged as bugs, then the quickest way to a solution is to put together a very basic test case displaying the bug and open a new bug on bugzilla.


Actually, that's not the quickest - the quickest way is to look at the source code and to write a patch and submit that to bugzilla.

Anyway, with the bundles issue, what is the problem? Mine works fine.

With the 2nd issue to do with prefixing methods with formnames, I also don't understand. Which methods? In Javascript? And which routines?

Regards
Adam

On 04/06/2004 09:25 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi

Not as far as I know

Hermod

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Otto, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2004 09:24
Til: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Emne: AW: validation with struts 1.2


And is there any solution?


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. April 2004 08:53
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: SV: validation with struts 1.2


Hi


So now we know of two problems with it :)

1. Bundles don't work
2. It prefixes the methods with the formname, but the validation
routines don't not know this.

Hemrod

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Otto, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2004 08:50
Til: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Emne: AW: validation with struts 1.2


It doesn't search the message text in this bundle. It was been ignored.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. April 2004 08:44
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: SV: validation with struts 1.2


Hi


And what excactly is the problem ?


Hermod


-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: Otto, Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2004 08:42
Til: Struts-User (E-Mail)
Emne: validation with struts 1.2


Hi,


i have downloaded struts 1.2. It contains a new commons-validation.jar.
This supported the bundle attribute of the msg element. But it doesnt't
function.


Does someone use this kind of validation?


Regards,


Frank


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that DnB NOR cannot
accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with
customers as a part of an email.


This email message has been virus checked by the virus programs used
in the DnB NOR Group.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







--
struts 1.2 + tomcat 5.0.19 + java 1.4.2
Linux 2.4.20 Debian


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to