It will make sense. You'd let the j2ee container take care of managing dao manager instances and you'll get transaction support (if you need it). Plus, if you decide to move your persistence layer to another server it will be nicely packaged within the .ear that contains your ejb session facade.
Best, James --- http://www.devbistro.com --- "Zhang, Larry (L.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems session facade design pattern is becoming > ubiquitous. My question is that > if we are not going to use EJB(but we do have > DAO-data access object), does it still make sense to > use session facade? > > Thanks. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
