2012/11/30 Eric Lentz <ericle...@outfastsource.com>:
> Inside of an interceptor, I'd like to add a value onto the the ValueStack.
> What is the best way to do this?
>
> I tried this:
> invocation.getStack().set("myValueStackName", theValueIwantForThisName);
>
> But that pushes that value to the top of the stack, pushing my action class
> down which becomes problematic for values getting assigned to the action
> class. For example, a JSP field with name="fooId" and an action class with
> a field of Long fooId. When I have the above code, fooId doesn't get
> assigned. When I don't, it works as you would expect.

use stack.pop() and stack.push()

> I guess my interceptor could be later in the stack of interceptors, after
> the ParametersInterceptor, but that seems fragile. Some other developer
> could come along and move it and now there are bugs. Plus, I'd prefer this
> particular interceptor be at or near the beginning of the list of
> interceptors.
>
> So, how do I assign, but leave the action class at the top of the stack? I
> could pop the action, add my value and then add the action back on, but is
> there a better way?

No, this is the preferred way. And please keep in mind the stack will
be searched from top to down for given value name.


Regards
-- 
Ɓukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to