One more thing, in my actual code, I am doing ai.invokeActionOnly(), rather
than ai.invoke() .
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Ali Akhtar <ali.rac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hopefully I am incorrect, however the following lines in my interceptor's
> intercept method:
>
> action = ai.getAction();
> String result = ai.invoke();
> logger.debug("Orig action : " + action.toString() +" , now : " +
> ai.getAction().toString() );
>
> Do produce two different toString() codes for the original action and the
> new ai.getAction(). Is there any scenario in which this could happen?
>
> I'm serving two actions from the same class, i.e mysite/foo is being
> served by FooAction.foo(), and mysite/bar is being served by
> FooAction.bar(). So in both cases, the same class is serving two actions.
> Could this have any bearing on why action.toString() and
> ai.getAction.toString() are producing different codes?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You are incorrect. Actions are instantiated per-request. Other than that,
>> you will need to provide a working example that exhibits the incorrect
>> behavior.
>> On Nov 3, 2013 12:57 PM, "Ali Akhtar" <ali.rac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > It seems that if I have two concurrent requests being made to the same
>> > action, e.g mysite.com/fooAction, then struts resets the first action's
>> > instance while that instance may still be in the interceptor.
>> >
>> > E.g, if I have the following code in my interceptor:
>> >
>> > action = ai.getAction();
>> > String result = ai.invoke();
>> > logger.debug("Orig action : " + action.toString() +" , now : " +
>> > ai.getAction().toString() );
>> >
>> > And if I make two concurrent requests to the same action (e.g using
>> > javascript), then the line:
>> >
>> > logger.debug("Orig action : " + action.toString() +" , now : " +
>> > ai.getAction().toString() );
>> >
>> > will sometimes produce two different `toString()` codes, showing that
>> the
>> > original action was in a different instance than the last action.
>> >
>> > This is a big problem, because now, if I had any code in the
>> interceptor,
>> > which was setting certain things on my action, e.g doing the following:
>> >
>> > MyAction action = (MyAction) ai.getAction();
>> > Auth auth = new Auth ( action.getSession() );
>> > action.setAuth(auth);
>> > action.setCookiesMap( Util.getAllCookies() );
>> > String result = ai.invoke();
>> >
>> > then there is no guarantee that all those things which I've set on my
>> > action are in fact going to be passed to the correct instance. I.e, when
>> > `ai.invoke()` is called, it may in fact call a completely different
>> > instance of the action, which has different cookies or other data set on
>> > it. This could result in different users being given access to each
>> other's
>> > data.
>> >
>> > Am I correct in all of this? If so, is there a solution to this problem?
>> > Because this seems to completely defeat the purpose of interceptors.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>>
>
>
